data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a50f/8a50f74ea7716482d600fbc378a9e30709cdd3fe" alt=""
I'm a big fan of The Guardian's Alex von Tunzelmann's
Reel History film reviews (I've
previously mentioned her reviews for
Life of Brian and the 1956
The Ten Commandments). So I was pleased to see that von Tunzelmann recently reviewed Fred Zinnemann's 1966 film
A Man For All Seasons about the life of Thomas More. Ok so it's not a Bible film, but it is a historical film about a religious character, and as I wrote a little about it in my film chapter in
Cut to the Chase 0.5 I thought I'd mention it. And, of course, it could also be classed as a hagiopic, and whilst it doesn't fit with
Pamela Grace's classification, the exception only makes it more interesting. Hagiopics (according to Grace) are not only films about the life of a saint, but the story about their divine encounters, suffering and experience of God coming good. In
A Man for All Seasons however More suffers plenty, but there is no divine encounter and ultimately God does not intervene.
Anyway, it's an interesting read. Anyone wanting a second opinion could try either
Marilyn Ferdinand's review (Ferdy on Films) or
Steven D. Greydanus's (Decent Films).
Labels: Other Films
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home